Returns – Global Equities vs. Global Bonds vs. Gold vs. World Portfolio

Returns – Global Equities vs. Global Bonds vs. Gold vs. World Portfolio Since 1950, the world portfolio has earned a real 4.1% annual return — global equities led with 7.3%, gold lagged at 2.5%, and global bonds barely reached 1.8%. The long-run verdict is clear: equities have won. Image: Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research

World Portfolio

World Portfolio The world’s portfolio remains tilted toward the U.S.—in both stocks and bonds. Gold holds a modest 6%, while crypto barely cracks 1%. Image: Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research

Bloomberg’s Global 60/40 Equity/Fixed Income Portfolio

Bloomberg’s Global 60/40 Equity/Fixed Income Portfolio Reaching a new all-time high, the global 60/40 portfolio has demonstrated renewed strength and remains a cornerstone strategy for long-term investors who prioritize diversification, balance, and moderate risk tolerance. Image: Deutsche Bank

S&P 500 vs. 60/40 Portfolio

S&P 500 vs. 60/40 Portfolio Since 2020, the S&P 500 has delivered higher returns than the 60/40 portfolio but with greater volatility, while the 60/40 portfolio has provided more stability at the cost of lower overall gains. Image: Bloomberg

Risk Parity Model Portfolio Weights

Risk Parity Model Portfolio Weights In risk-parity strategies, the current equity allocation is at the 8th percentile—well below the median—reflecting a preference for safer assets despite the ongoing equity rally. Image: Deutsche Bank Asset Allocation

U.S. Equities – Foreign Investors’ Net Portfolio Equity Flows

U.S. Equities – Foreign Investors’ Net Portfolio Equity Flows Foreign investors’ recent behavior in U.S. equities—marked by limited activity and stable portfolio allocations—suggests a long-term bullish outlook on the resilience of the U.S. market. Image: Deutsche Bank

Real Total Return Performance of U.S. 60/40 Portfolio

Real Total Return Performance of U.S. 60/40 Portfolio The term “lost decade” for the traditional 60/40 portfolio holds historical significance, especially during the period from 2000 to 2009, when investors faced a real loss. Image: Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research

Return – Aggresive vs. Conservative Portfolios

Return – Aggresive vs. Conservative Portfolios Aggressive portfolios have historically demonstrated a greater ability to preserve capital compared to conservative portfolios. Image: BofA Research Investment Committee

Returns for 60/40 Portfolio

Returns for 60/40 Portfolio So far, the traditional 60% stocks and 40% bonds portfolio is performing well year-to-date. Image: BofA Global Investment Strategy